Betutteling? Je bedoelt Repressie!

Aangezien ik de laatste tijd meer en meer het woord 'betutteling' om me heen hoor waar het overheidsbemoeienis betreft vind ik het nu hoog tijd hier even heel kritisch over te schrijven. Het is duidelijk een propaganda campagne van de MSM (mainstream media), en laat me uitleggen waarom:

Waar denk je aan als je het hebt over betutteling? Dit woord gaat over de (over)bezorgdheid van ouders naar het kind. Een bezorgdheid die zich bijv. uit als 'heb je wel een warme jas aan', 'eet je wel genoeg' enz. Je begrijpt wel wat ik bedoel. Dit is ongevaarlijk, hooguit irritant gedrag in de beleving van het kind.

De overheid is alles behalve een bezorgde ouder - het mag die rol niet eens aannemen - en de overheid is alles behalve ongevaarlijk. Door het woord 'betutteling' te te gebruiken wordt er een valse illusie gewekt dat de overheid enkel handelt uit bezorgdheid en het beste met ons voor heeft, terwijl - helaas - het tegenovergestelde waar is. Tot nu toe heeft nog nergens uit mogen blijken dat de overheid te vertrouwen is, noch dat het in onze bestwil handelt, hoe ver je ook terug kijkt in de geschiedenis wereldwijd.

Telkens als we het hebben over betutteling, hebben we het dus werkelijk over REPRESSIE! Oftewel onderdrukking. Het wordt tijd de juiste termen te gaan gebruiken omdat we ons zelf voor de gek houden (met wat ons gevoerd wordt). Net zoals het omdraaien van de Waarden en Normen door J.P., iets wat als zeer gevaarlijk aangemerkt dient te worden! Als je waarden goed zij heb je geen normen nodig, waar als je normen voorop stelt regels en weten als dominante kracht hanteert: de politiestaat.

Mensen, hou op met dat vreselijke woord 'betutteling' te gebruiken, het is niet correct. Noem het voor wat het is: repressie!

Hoe moeten we anders de waanzin noemen dat de overheid maar blijft produceren, in steeds hoger tempo en in steeds agressievere mate? Al die gekte is al lang niet meer te toetsen aan de Nederlandse Grondwet waar ons personeel (de rambtenaren) trouw aan heeft moeten zweren.

Het beperken van onze vrijheid is een schending van de mensenrechten. Lees elk verdrag wat hierover gaat: bij onderdrukking hebben wij - de mensen - het recht om elk middel mogelijk aan te grijpen om ons te ontdoen van die tirannie. Ik roep hier niet op tot geweld, maar tot MASSALE BURGER ONGEHOORZAAMHEID

Ik roep op tot de meest rustige en meest vreedzame revolutie mogelijk, een revolutie van ongehoorzaamheid en eigen verantwoordelijkheid. De overheid weigert pertinent naar het volk te luisteren, nu draaien we de boel gewoon om!

Stop de Repressie - wees bewust en vooral Ongehoorzaam! Laat ze maar stikken in hun EPD, EKD, al hun pasjes en chipjes, klikplicht en ga zo maar door. Dikke lul, ik doe er niet aan mee, over my cold dead body! Dit is geen grootspraak, ik weiger deelname aan elke vorm van repressie, ik draag geen ausweiss (want dat is het), noch elke andere vorm van identificatie, rot maar op. Ik ben geen crimineel, ik doe nix verkeerd, dus laat me verdomme met rust.

Leest het Universele Verdrag voor de Rechten van de Mens (UVRM), alles wat daar afbreuk aan doet mag, en moet je weigeren, omdat de machten ALTIJD uitmonden in tirannie als je ze hun gang laat gaan. Lees hoe het in de jaren 1930 in Duitsland ging: exact hetzelfde met de controlewaanzin! Als we niet leren van de geschiedenis dan zal die zich zeker herhalen!!!

Dus, zogenaamde regering, neem al die pasjes, chippies en waanzinwetten en steek die heel diep daar waar de zon niet schijnt!!!

10 december 2008: 60 jaar UVRM

60 jaar UVRM, maar geen overheid of machthebber die zich er aan houdt!!!

Deze verjaardag is een mooie gelegenheid om ons universele recht op vrijheid en veiligheid terug te claimen/af te dwingen van de controlezieke regering en dus het koningshuis [Hoofdstuk 2, Artikel 42, # 1 van de Nederlandse Grondwet: De regering wordt gevormd door de Koning en de ministers.]

Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens

Aangenomen door de algemene vergadering van de Verenigde Naties op 10 december 1948

Preambule

Overwegende, dat erkenning van de inherente waardigheid en van de gelijke en onvervreemdbare rechten van alle leden van de mensengemeenschap grondslag is voor de vrijheid, gerechtigheid en vrede in de wereld;

Overwegende, dat terzijdestelling van en minachting voor de rechten van de mens geleid hebben tot barbaarse handelingen, die het geweten van de mensheid geweld hebben aangedaan en dat de komst van een wereld, waarin de mensen vrijheid van meningsuiting en geloof zullen genieten, en vrij zullen zijn van vrees en gebrek, is verkondigd als het hoogste ideaal van iedere mens;

Overwegende, dat het van het grootste belang is, dat de rechten van de mens beschermd worden door de suprematie van het recht, opdat de mens niet gedwongen worde om in laatste instantie zijn toevlucht te nemen tot opstand tegen tyrannie en onderdrukking;

Overwegende, dat het van het grootste belang is om de ontwikkeling van vriendschappelijke betrekkingen tussen de naties te bevorderen;

Overwegende, dat de volkeren van de Verenigde Naties in het Handvest hun vertrouwen in de fundamentele rechten van de mens, in de waardigheid en de waarde van de mens en in de gelijke rechten van mannen en vrouwen opnieuw hebben bevestigd, en besloten hebben om sociale vooruitgang en een hogere levensstandaard in groter vrijheid te bevorderen;

Overwegende, dat de Staten, welke Lid zijn van de Verenigde Naties, zich plechtig verbonden hebben om, in samenwerking met de Organisatie van de Verenigde Naties, overal de eerbied voor en inachtneming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden te bevorderen;

Overwegende, dat het van het grootste belang is voor de volledige nakoming van deze verbintenis, dat een ieder begrip hebbe voor deze rechten en vrijheden;

Op grond daarvan proclameert de Algemene Vergadering deze Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens als het gemeenschappelijk door alle volkeren en alle naties te bereiken ideaal, opdat ieder individu en elk orgaan van de gemeenschap, met deze verklaring voortdurend voor ogen, er naar zal streven door onderwijs en opvoeding de eerbied voor deze rechten en vrijheden te bevorderen, en door vooruitstrevende maatregelen, op nationaal en internationaal terrein, deze rechten algemeen en daadwerkelijk te doen erkennen en toepassen, zowel onder de volkeren van Staten die Lid van de Verenigde Naties zijn, zelf, als onder de volkeren van gebieden, die onder hun jurisdictie staan:

Artikel 1

Alle mensen worden vrij en gelijk in waardigheid en rechten geboren. Zij zijn begiftigd met verstand en geweten, en behoren zich jegens elkander in een geest van broederschap te gedragen.

Artikel 2

Een ieder heeft aanspraak op alle rechten en vrijheden, in deze Verklaring opgesomd, zonder enig onderscheid van welke aard ook, zoals ras, kleur, geslacht, taal, godsdienst, politieke of andere overtuiging, nationale of maatschappelijke afkomst, eigendom, geboorte of andere status.

Verder zal geen onderscheid worden gemaakt naar de politieke, juridische of internationale status van het land of gebied, waartoe iemand behoort, onverschillig of het een onafhankelijk, trust-, of niet-zelfbesturend gebied betreft, dan wel of er een andere beperking van de soevereiniteit bestaat.

Artikel 3

Een ieder heeft het recht op leven, vrijheid en onschendbaarheid van zijn persoon.

Artikel 4

Niemand zal in slavernij of horigheid gehouden worden. Slavernij en slavenhandel in iedere vorm zijn verboden.

Artikel 5

Niemand zal onderworpen worden aan folteringen, noch aan een wrede, onmenselijke of onterende behandeling of bestraffing.

Artikel 6

Een ieder heeft, waar hij zich ook bevindt, het recht als persoon erkend te worden voor de wet.

Artikel 7

Allen zijn gelijk voor de wet en hebben zonder onderscheid aanspraak op gelijke bescherming door de wet. Allen hebben aanspraak op gelijke bescherming tegen iedere achterstelling in strijd met deze Verklaring en tegen iedere ophitsing tot een dergelijke achterstelling.

Artikel 8

Een ieder heeft recht op daadwerkelijke rechtshulp van bevoegde nationale rechterlijke instanties tegen handelingen, welke in strijd zijn met de grondrechten hem toegekend bij Grondwet of wet.

Artikel 9

Niemand zal onderworpen worden aan willekeurige arrestatie, detentie of verbanning.

Artikel 10

Een ieder heeft, in volle gelijkheid, recht op een eerlijke en openbare behandeling van zijn zaak door een onafhankelijke en onpartijdige rechterlijke instantie bij het vaststellen van zijn rechten en verplichtingen en bij het bepalen van de gegrondheid van een tegen hem ingestelde strafvervolging.

Artikel 11

1. Een ieder, die wegens een strafbaar feit wordt vervolgd, heeft er recht op voor onschuldig gehouden te worden, totdat zijn schuld krachtens de wet bewezen wordt in een openbare rechtszitting, waarbij hem alle waarborgen, nodig voor zijn verdediging, zijn toegekend.
2. Niemand zal voor schuldig gehouden worden aan enig strafrechtelijk vergrijp op grond van enige handeling of enig verzuim, welke naar nationaal of internationaal recht geen strafrechtelijk vergrijp betekenden op het tijdstip, waarop de handeling of het verzuim begaan werd. Evenmin zal een zwaardere straf worden opgelegd dan die, welke ten tijde van het begaan van het strafbare feit van toepassing was.

Artikel 12

Niemand zal onderworpen worden aan willekeurige inmenging in zijn persoonlijke aangelegenheden, in zijn gezin, zijn tehuis of zijn briefwisseling, noch aan enige aantasting van zijn eer of goede naam. Tegen een dergelijke inmenging of aantasting heeft een ieder recht op bescherming door de wet.

Artikel 13

1. Een ieder heeft het recht zich vrijelijk te verplaatsen en te vertoeven binnen de grenzen van elke Staat.
2. Een ieder heeft het recht welk land ook, met inbegrip van het zijne, te verlaten en naar zijn land terug te keren.

Artikel 14

1. Een ieder heeft het recht om in andere landen asiel te zoeken en te genieten tegen vervolging.
2. Op dit recht kan geen beroep worden gedaan ingeval van strafvervolgingen wegens misdrijven van niet-politieke aard of handelingen in strijd met de doeleinden en beginselen van de Verenigde Naties.

Artikel 15

1. Een ieder heeft het recht op een nationaliteit.
2. Aan niemand mag willekeurig zijn nationaliteit worden ontnomen, noch het recht worden ontzegd om van nationaliteit te veranderen.

Artikel 16

1. Zonder enige beperking op grond van ras, nationaliteit of godsdienst, hebben mannen en vrouwen van huwbare leeftijd het recht om te huwen en een gezin te stichten. Zij hebben gelijke rechten wat het huwelijk betreft, tijdens het huwelijk en bij de ontbinding ervan.
2. Een huwelijk kan slechts worden gesloten met de vrije en volledige toestemming van de aanstaande echtgenoten.
3. Het gezin is de natuurlijke en fundamentele groepseenheid van de maatschappij en heeft recht op bescherming door de maatschappij en de Staat.

Artikel 17

1. Een ieder heeft recht op eigendom, hetzij alleen, hetzij tezamen met anderen.
2. Niemand mag willekeurig van zijn eigendom worden beroofd.

Artikel 18

Een ieder heeft recht op vrijheid van gedachte, geweten en godsdienst; dit recht omvat tevens de vrijheid om van godsdienst of overtuiging te veranderen, alsmede de vrijheid hetzij alleen, hetzij met anderen zowel in het openbaar als in zijn particuliere leven zijn godsdienst of overtuiging te belijden door het onderwijzen ervan, door de praktische toepassing, door eredienst en de inachtneming van de geboden en voorschriften.

Artikel 19

Een ieder heeft recht op vrijheid van mening en meningsuiting. Dit recht omvat de vrijheid om zonder inmenging een mening te koesteren en om door alle middelen en ongeacht grenzen inlichtingen en denkbeelden op te sporen, te ontvangen en door te geven.

Artikel 20

1. Een ieder heeft recht op vrijheid van vreedzame vereniging en vergadering.
2. Niemand mag worden gedwongen om tot een vereniging te behoren.

Artikel 21

1. Een ieder heeft het recht om deel te nemen aan het bestuur van zijn land, rechtstreeks of door middel van vrij gekozen vertegenwoordigers.
2. Een ieder heeft het recht om op voet van gelijkheid te worden toegelaten tot de overheidsdiensten van zijn land.
3. De wil van het volk zal de grondslag zijn van het gezag van de Regering; deze wil zal tot uiting komen in periodieke en eerlijke verkiezingen, die gehouden zullen worden krachtens algemeen en gelijkwaardig kiesrecht en bij geheime stemmingen of volgens een procedure, die evenzeer de vrijheid van de stemmen verzekert.

Artikel 22

Een ieder heeft als lid van de gemeenschap recht op maatschappelijke zekerheid en heeft er aanspraak op, dat door middel van nationale inspanning en internationale samenwerking, en overeenkomstig de organisatie en de hulpbronnen van de betreffende Staat, de economische, sociale en culturele rechten, die onmisbaar zijn voor zijn waardigheid en voor de vrije ontplooiing van zijn persoonlijkheid, verwezenlijkt worden.

Artikel 23

1. Een ieder heeft recht op arbeid, op vrije keuze van beroep, op rechtmatige en gunstige arbeidsvoorwaarden en op bescherming tegen werkloosheid.
2. Een ieder, zonder enige achterstelling, heeft recht op gelijk loon voor gelijke arbeid.
3. Een ieder, die arbeid verricht, heeft recht op een rechtvaardige en gunstige beloning, welke hem en zijn gezin een menswaardig bestaan verzekert, welke beloning zo nodig met andere middelen van sociale bescherming zal worden aangevuld.
4. Een ieder heeft het recht om vakverenigingen op te richten en zich daarbij aan te sluiten ter bescherming van zijn belangen.

Artikel 24

Een ieder heeft recht op rust en op eigen vrije tijd, met inbegrip van een redelijke beperking van de arbeidstijd, en op periodieke vakanties met behoud van loon.

Artikel 25

1. Een ieder heeft recht op een levensstandaard, die hoog genoeg is voor de gezondheid en het welzijn van zichzelf en zijn gezin, waaronder inbegrepen voeding, kleding, huisvesting en geneeskundige verzorging en de noodzakelijke sociale diensten, alsmede het recht op voorziening in geval van werkloosheid, ziekte, invaliditeit, overlijden van de echtgenoot, ouderdom of een ander gemis aan bestaansmiddelen, ontstaan ten gevolge van omstandigheden onafhankelijk van zijn wil.
2. Moeder en kind hebben recht op bijzondere zorg en bijstand. Alle kinderen, al dan niet wettig, zullen dezelfde sociale bescherming genieten.

Artikel 26

1. Een ieder heeft recht op onderwijs; het onderwijs zal kosteloos zijn, althans wat het lager en basisonderwijs betreft. Het lager onderwijs zal verplicht zijn. Ambachtsonderwijs en beroepsopleiding zullen algemeen beschikbaar worden gesteld. Hoger onderwijs zal openstaan voor een ieder, die daartoe de begaafdheid bezit.
2. Het onderwijs zal gericht zijn op de volle ontwikkeling van de menselijke persoonlijkheid en op de versterking van de eerbied voor de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden. Het zal het begrip, de verdraagzaamheid en de vriendschap onder alle naties, rassen of godsdienstige groepen bevorderen en het zal de werkzaamheden van de Verenigde Naties voor de handhaving van de vrede steunen.
3. Aan de ouders komt in de eerste plaats het recht toe om de soort van opvoeding en onderwijs te kiezen, welke aan hun kinderen zal worden gegeven.

Artikel 27

1. Een ieder heeft het recht om vrijelijk deel te nemen aan het culturele leven van de gemeenschap, om te genieten van kunst en om deel te hebben aan wetenschappelijke vooruitgang en de vruchten daarvan.
2. Een ieder heeft het recht op de bescherming van de geestelijke en materiële belangen, voortspruitende uit een wetenschappelijk, letterkundig of artistiek werk, dat hij heeft voortgebracht.

Artikel 28

Een ieder heeft recht op het bestaan van een zodanige maatschappelijke en internationale orde, dat de rechten en vrijheden, in deze Verklaring genoemd, daarin ten volle kunnen worden verwezenlijkt.

Artikel 29

1. Een ieder heeft plichten jegens de gemeenschap, zonder welke de vrije en volledige ontplooiing van zijn persoonlijkheid niet mogelijk is.
2. In de uitoefening van zijn rechten en vrijheden zal een ieder slechts onderworpen zijn aan die beperkingen, welke bij de wet zijn vastgesteld en wel uitsluitend ter verzekering van de onmisbare erkenning en eerbiediging van de rechten en vrijheden van anderen en om te voldoen aan de gerechtvaardigde eisen van de moraliteit, de openbare orde en het algemeen welzijn in een democratische gemeenschap.
3. Deze rechten en vrijheden mogen in geen geval worden uitgeoefend in strijd met de doeleinden en beginselen van de Verenigde Naties [hier heb ik ernstig moeite mee aangezien de VN deze rechten dus naar eigen invulling kan wijzigen].

Artikel 30

Geen bepaling in deze Verklaring zal zodanig mogen worden uitgelegd, dat welke Staat, groep of persoon dan ook, daaraan enig recht kan ontlenen om iets te ondernemen of handelingen van welke aard ook te verrichten, die vernietiging van een van de rechten en vrijheden, in deze Verklaring genoemd, ten doel hebben.

http://www.uvrm.nl/
Engels: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

In kraanwater komen steeds meer verschillende medicijnen voor. Het RIVM vond vijftien geneesmiddelen in gezuiverd water, blijkt uit een onderzoek dat het instituut vandaag publiceert.

"Voor zover we kunnen overzien, gaat het om zulke lage concentraties dat ze nauwelijks of niet schadelijk zijn voor mensen", zegt onderzoeker Ans Versteegh, "maar we weten niet wat de effecten van langdurige blootstelling aan kleine hoeveelheden medicijnen zijn."

Bron / lees meer: www.brabantsdagblad.nl (artikel is inmiddels van de site gehaald)
Zie Zaplog

---

Steeds vaker medicijnen in drinkwater

DEN HAAG (ANP) - Drinkwater bevat steeds vaker lage concentraties geneesmiddelen. De medicijnen die voorkomen in drinkwater zijn slecht afbreekbaar en worden veel gebruikt. Dat blijkt uit onderzoek van het Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM) in opdracht van het ministerie van VROM.

Het RIVM benadrukt dat de hoeveelheden zo laag zijn dat effecten op de volksgezondheid zijn te verwaarlozen. Tijdens een onderzoek in 2003 werden vier geneesmiddelen aangetroffen in het drinkwater. Bij het meest recente onderzoek werden 22 geneesmiddelen aangetoond.

De meest voorkomende medicijnen in het water zijn de pijnstillers acetylsalicylzuur en fenazon en het epilepsiemiddel carbamazepine. Incidenteel trof het RIVM resten van het antidepressivum fluoxetine aan.

Bron: Brabants Dagblad

---

Antidepressiva in Groninger drinkwater

De gemeente Groningen overweegt 1 juni 2009 te beginnen met het op proef toevoegen van een lage dosering antidepressiva aan het drinkwater. Aanleiding is de constatering van de Raad voor Gezondheidsonderzoek dat depressie druk bezig is de belangrijkste ziekte in Nederland te worden. In hun op 29 oktober gepresenteerde advies Van gegevens verzekerd. Kennis over de volksgezondheid in Nederland nu en in de toekomst staat te lezen dat op basis van longitudinaal epidemiologisch onderzoek geconcludeerd kan worden dat depressie en aan depressie verwante ziektes binnen vijf tot tien jaar de belangrijkste reden van werkverzuim zullen zijn en een zwaarwegend beroep op de gezondheidszorg zullen vormen.

Prof. dr. Spakkers, hoogleraar psychiatrie van het UMC St. Radboud, heeft zich positief uitgelaten over dit voorstel. Volgens haar zijn de torenhoge kosten van werkverzuim te voorkomen door een preventieve toediening van een lage dosis SSRI’s (stoffen die de heropname van serotonine in de hersenen blokkeren)[het is nooit onomstotelijk bewezen dat een tekort aan serotonine in de hersenen de oorzaak is van een depressie, id-fix], die van haar eigenlijk geen ‘medicatie’ mag heten. Ze vergelijkt het met het toevoegen van jodium aan keukenzout ter voorkoming van schildkliervergrotingen: “Daar was in het begin ook weerstand tegen, maar uiteindelijk blijkt een kleine, haast onschuldige dosis jodide veel gezondheidsproblemen te voorkomen. Zo moet het voornemen van Groningen ook worden bezien: water drinken wordt niet de genezing van depressieve patiënten, daar is de dosis SSRI natuurlijk veel te laag voor, maar met deze pre-emptive strike wordt het prevaleren van lichte depressie naar schatting met 25 tot 30 procent teruggedrongen. Het in lichte mate prikkelen van de neurotransmitters blijkt daarvoor dus al voldoende te zijn.”

Wel waarschuwt professor Spakkers voor een al te eenzijdige aanpak. “De kous is hiermee natuurlijk niet af. Psychosociale factoren, zoals de leefomgeving, kunnen een onderhoudende of zelfs oorzakelijke rol spelen bij het ontstaan van depressies. Het is dus zeker van belang je niet te beperken tot alleen de biologische aanpak.”

Bron: Spelt.nl

There will be NO revolution

Reality check ?!

Big Pharma's New Mass-Drugging Agenda Pushes Statin Drugs for Healthy People

(NaturalNews) Drug companies used to sell products for the treatment of disease. But it didn't take long for Big Pharma to figure out that the number of diseased people is limited, and therefore so are drug profits. To bypass this problem, they began inventing diseases and marketing them to the public as a way to create new demand for high-profit pharmaceuticals. This is how "bi-polar" came into existence, for example. Same story for ADHD, social anxiety disorder and even high cholesterol (which isn't a disease in the first place).

But even this disease mongering strategy had its limits. Only a limited number of gullible doctors and consumers can be convincingly deluded into believing in fictitious diseases and psychiatric disorders. To really expand its profits, Big Pharma was going to have to do something revolutionary: They were going to have to figure out a way to sell drugs to people who weren't sick at all.

Or, put another way: They needed a way to sell drugs to healthy people.

AstraZeneca, Crestor and the new era of mass-drugging

The American Medical Association, not surprisingly, came to the rescue. A study called "Jupiter" was presented at an AMA conference last Sunday. It was funded by Crestor maker Astrazeneca, and it claims that statin drugs save lives when given to healthy people who show no signs of high cholesterol!

Physicians and Big Pharma reps were practically falling over each other Sunday in a mad stampede to the stage in order to out-do each other on making the most outrageous claims surrounding statin drugs. One doctor said the drugs are so useful at saving lives that governments around the world should start prescribing them to practically everyone. Another said that tens of millions of adults should now be put on what he called "statin therapy." (It's therapy now, folks, not medicine!) Not to be outdone, a third doctor suggested the drugs be dripped into the public water supply in order to dose everyone!

(Fluoridation isn't enough, it seems. Now they want to drip drugs into the water supply. Don't they realize the water supply is already contaminated with pharmaceuticals?)

The AMA convention was so heated with the proclamations of the pharmaceutical faithful that an uninformed onlooker might have mistaken it for a Southern Baptist Revival event. Except it wasn't faith in God that was being praised here; it was faith in chemicals to conquer nature and dominate human biology.

The new position of the pharmaceutical industry, you see, is that the human body is born deficient in pharmaceuticals. Human biology must now be "corrected" with "therapeutic doses" of these patented chemicals. Oh, and don't forget to leave your wallet at the door, too, because these drugs aren't free.

$10 billion for yet more pharmaceuticals shoved down your throat

In fact, this USA Today article (http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/200...) calculated that prescribing the statin drugs more widely in the USA would add $10 billion a year to the national debt.

Perhaps in an age where the Federal Reserve is secretly swindling the taxpayers for more than one trillion dollars, ten billion doesn't seem like much. But it comes out to $500,000 spent on these drugs for each life "saved" by statin drugs... and that's if you actually believe the study that was funded by AstraZeneca (...and you'd have to be more than a bit gullible to swallow that junk science in the first place).

What's "junk science" about the AstraZeneca study? For starters, the study was halted two years early because it was claimed the results were so positive for the control group that it would have been unethical to continue denying the same drugs to the placebo group.

Gee, who needs actual science anymore when you've got so much faith in the safety of drugs that you don't even need to actually complete the clinical trials? (Why even bother with the study at all?)

Apparently, modern drug trials only need to show a hint of early success in order to be halted and declared an outrageous success. But it's no coincidence that the halting of the Crestor trial just happened to take place before the statin drug side effects would begin to emerge in the control group.

By halting the study, you see, what AstraZeneca cleverly did was cut off any possibility of side effects becoming apparent. What kind of side effects? Muscle weakness, heart attacks, diabetes and death, to name just a few. In fact, the study already documents a skyrocketing percentage of those taking the statin drug suddenly being afflicted with diabetes, but they stopped the study before they could really figure out why, and all the pro-drug physicians pushing this junk science agenda are dismissing the diabetes results as irrelevant.

Oh, I see. Clinical trial results are only "relevant" when they support the desired outcome. When they show problems, they're dismissed as "irrelevant." And when a trial begins to show undesirable side effects, it's simply halted and declared an outrageous success.

Like I said: Why bother with actual science anymore? With a pre-decided agenda like the one applied to this study, the Scientific Method is a complete no-show. Real science has been replaced with a sloppy, cheap replica of science.

Quackery is alive and well in mainstream orthodox medicine. But it's not called quackery; it's called "evidence-based medicine."

Here's what the evidence really shows...

Just out of curiosity, let's look at the evidence being touted by the proponents of this study, shall we? Depending on exactly how you crunch the numbers, the study shows that one heart "event" (like a heart attack, stroke or death) is avoided for every 80 people put on the drug.

That means 79 people have no benefit from the drug whatsoever! (If you believe the study, anyway.)

But 1 out of 80 is quite enough for the pro-drug pushers to proclaim statin drugs to be nothing less than a modern medical miracle. If it were given to enough people, we'd save a whole bunch of lives, we're told. And the $10 billion in government expenditures is worth it!

Conventional docs aren't very good at math, by the way. All the hype about this particular study proves it: If $500,000 worth of Crestor can save one life, might there be a less expensive way to save that same life?

Let's see... The amazing nutrient resveratrol could be given to the same number of people for a fraction of the cost: About $5,000 by my estimation. That's 1/100th the cost. B vitamins could also be provided at extremely low cost, and they are well known to prevent heart attacks and strokes. In fact, the list of nutritional supplements that could safely and cost effectively prevent heart attacks is quite staggering: Magnesium, omega-3 supplements, juniper berry extracts, aged garlic extracts, red yeast rice, CoQ10, cayenne pepper and many more.

In fact, once you become aware of all the natural supplements that can prevent heart attacks and strokes, you'd have to be a complete fool to spend $500,000 to save just one life, especially when you could save 100 lives for the same (or smaller) investment in natural remedies. Many of these are revealed in the book The Weiss Method, by Dr. Decker Weiss, by the way (http://www.truthpublishing.com/weissmet...).

Why orthodox medicine abandoned the science and the people

Note, curiously, that no conventional docs are promoting any of these natural heart remedies, even though any honest assessment of their medical merits would reveal them to be even more impressive than statin drugs. Even more importantly, these natural supplements don't destroy your health and cause nutritional deficiencies like statin drugs do. They won't kill you and they won't contaminate the environment with yet more pharmaceuticals flushed down the toilet.

None of this appears to be of interest to the American Medical Association and its faithful cohorts. Honest science no longer matters in the world of orthodox medicine. Helping health consumers save money while they're saving lives isn't even on the list of priorities.

Instead, the modern institution of medicine operates like a cult, and the believers of this cult have been programmed to ignore any evidence that contradicts their existing beliefs. Pharmaceutical medicine is the one truth, the one god that they worship, oblivious to the real world passing them by, where superfoods, herbs and nutritional supplements have already made pharmaceuticals virtually obsolete. The honest benefits of natural remedies dwarf the "miraculous" study results achieved by modern medicine's dishonest researchers who twist and manipulate clinical trials until they can wring out the numbers they plotted to engineer before the study even started.

But it's not enough to fabricate the science and try to make your own drugs look better than they really are: Many members of the Cult of Pharmacology are busy applying the same junk science agenda to their discrediting of natural remedies. Almost every week, we read about yet another vitamin or supplement being "proven" worthless in the mainstream media.

Vitamin E is a favorite target of the Big Pharma cultists, because they can deviously select synthetic vitamin E (as they always do) for their studies and avoid using the natural vitamin E that actually works. Once the study results produce the anti-vitamin results they're looking for, they pronounce things like, "Vitamin E kills people!" and other similar nonsense (which the mainstream media faithfully reprints ad nauseum).

Yes, to hear it from the Pharmacult faithful, the human body is deficient in medications, but somehow incompatible with nutritional supplements.

This is the official position of the FDA, the AMA, the brainwashed physicians and the med schools that teach this bunk: Nutrition has no benefit in the human body and supplements have no effects other than damaging the human body. Yet pharmaceuticals fulfill a deficiency in human biology that's been present since birth. Human beings are born deficient (sorta like being "born into sin") and must be "saved" with the quack medicines of the pharmacological cult.

The cult that keeps on killing

It's an obvious point, but I'll mention it just in case: This cult is extremely dangerous to the safety of our citizens. By its own admission, it is responsible for the death of 783,000 Americans each year (called "iatrogenic deaths"), and their drugs alone kill at least 100,000 American citizens annually. And yet the Cult of Pharmacology, like all whacky cults, thinks it needs to spread and "convert" everyone to its medicines (Kool-Aid, anyone?) so that all Americans are members of the cult, sucking down statin drugs, fluoride, antidepressants, vaccines or whatever new chemical the cult demands we blindly swallow.

Oh, and these treatments aren't free, by the way. This cult is run by corporations, and they want not only your loyalty and your mind... they want your wallet, too! Hand over your life savings, folks, for the privilege of being treated with what is claimed to be the best health care system in the world. (Insert laughter here...)

Join us or die

And now, the most dangerous era of the Cult of Pharmacology has begun: The era of Gunpoint Medicine, where anyone refusing to join the cult by taking their medicines is considered a criminal.

It's already happening in New Jersey, Maryland and Texas. There, parents who say no to mandatory vaccinations risk being arrested at gunpoint and having their children stolen away from them by Child Protective Services.

In the UK just this week, a 13-year-old girl who refused to undergo heart transplant surgery was told she would be forced to undergo the procedure, essentially at gunpoint, and her parents were threatened with arrest. They took the case to court and had to win back their right to refuse the heart transplant procedure and a lifetime of expensive anti-rejection drugs that would only benefit -- surprise! -- Big Pharma's bottom line.

These are not fictions: This is happening across the world right now. Mandatory mental health "screening" programs have been proposed in the U.S., and they would put tens of millions of teens and expectant mothers on dangerous psychotic drugs known to cause violent thoughts and suicidal behavior.

The Cult of Pharmacology, you see, isn't satisfied to merely have your wallet. It's not even enough to own your body. What they want is your soul. They are on a dangerous religious crusade, and you are required to pledge your allegiance to the lab-coat-wearing gods of Pharmalot or you will be arrested, imprisoned and stripped of everything you value and love (like your own children).

Will statin drug consumption be enforced at gunpoint, too?

The next stage in this cultist expansion is, of course, the mandatory consumption of statin drugs by the citizenry.

If the drug company zealots can convince the U.S. government that statin drugs will save lives and somehow save it money on medical costs, we could soon see an effort to mandate the taking of statin drugs by all adults (and perhaps even children).

Don't think it could happen? Check your recent history on the situation with HPV vaccines. Refusing the vaccines makes you a criminal in at least two states in the U.S. right now, and drug companies are pushing new laws to criminalize the rejection of vaccines across the entire nation. Similarly, fluoridation laws subject the entire population to toxic fluoridation chemicals (which in no way resemble actual mineral fluoride, by the way), and even though rejecting fluoridated water is not yet a crime, I've met many dentists who think it should be.

There's little doubt that if the drug companies get their way, medicating yourself and your children with statin drugs, SSRIs or other hyped-up pharmaceuticals will no longer be optional: It will be mandated. And those who refuse will be rounded up and forcibly medicated. It's already happened: Read Children Herded Like Cattle Into Maryland Courthouse... at http://www.naturalnews.com/022267.html

It's important to realize that all government mandates are essentially enforced by the threat of violence or imprisonment. Even paying your vehicle license plate taxes is fundamentally enforced at gunpoint. If you don't believe me, just drive around with expired license plate tags for long enough, and sooner or later an armed officer of the State will stop your vehicle and threaten you with arrest if you don't pay money to the State. That officer is an extension of the power of the State, and his own personal power is enforced by the firearm carried at his side. (If you don't believe me, just ask the officer if he will leave his firearm in his own car, and see what he says...)

Many of Big Pharma's cultist doctors now believe that same power of enforcement at the end of a gun should be aimed at parents and their health decisions. Parents who, through the intelligent acquisition of knowledge about natural therapies, consciously choose non-conventional medical therapies for their children should be arrested, locked away and stripped of their own children, say these doctors. They are not fit to be parents if they will not medicate them with over 100 different vaccines, the doctors claim. The drug companies agree with them, too. How dare parents refuse to put their kids on chemotherapy, vaccines, or antidepressant drugs? It's downright un-American!

The upshot of all this is the growing power of a medical police state that might be more accurately called Medical Marxism. Under Big Pharma's medical Marxist regime, natural remedies will be outlawed, physicians will be indoctrinated with the propaganda of the state, and those who resist will be sent to the gulag.

Don't think it could happen? It's happening RIGHT NOW in America. The FDA has outlawed many natural remedies, physicians have already been brainwashed into drug-pushing automatons, and parents who have resisted conventional medical therapies for their children are being routinely arrested at gunpoint, imprisoned and separated from their families. We are dealing with the systematic destruction of health freedoms and the rise of medical violence against the People.

See my articles on:

Abraham Cherrix: http://www.naturalnews.com/Abraham_Cher...

Gunpoint Medicine: http://www.naturalnews.com/gunpoint_med...

HPV Vaccines: http://www.naturalnews.com/HPV_vaccine.html

How to fight back against medical tyranny

How can you fight back against this accelerating encroachment on your health freedoms? How can we save America from Medical Marxism and the tyranny of mandatory medicine?

We must end this era of Big Pharma dominance by taking aggressive action to arrest and prosecute the white-collar criminals running this system. Those who need to be arrested include top FDA bureaucrats, top Big Pharma CEOs, certain physicians (especially psychiatric doctors who are drugging children) and all the lawyers, researchers and enablers who have made this chemical holocaust possible.

I disagree with others on the 'net who have said these people need to be dragged away from their desks by angry mobs and dealt with in a way that resorts to violence. Although this has (sadly) happened before in violent cultural revolutions, as a promoter of non-violent solutions, I believe a much more sane option would be to arrest these people and grant them immunity for their crimes in exchange for their full testimony about their involvement in this criminal racket.

Strip them of their power, hold a series of "medical truth accords" and document the crimes against humanity that have been committed by this tyrannical medical system. In doing so, we will help protect future generations from pursuing the same destructive path of allowing for-profit corporations to dominate medicine: It's regulations, laws and so-called science.

Ultimately, we must end the medical violence against women, children and all citizens by putting a stop to the era of medical Marxism that has devastated the health of our nation for nearly a century.

We need a complete repeal of all pro-Pharma legislation, the ending of pharmaceutical advertisements, the abolition of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as we know it, the shutting down of medical schools that ensnare physicians in the Cult of Pharmacology and the shuttering of medical journals that have been bought off by drug company money.

In 2009, I will be personally organizing an international petition that calls for the restoration of health freedoms and the ending of medical violence against human beings. If you wish to join me in supporting this petition, subscribe now to the NaturalNews.com e-mail newsletter, and you'll be alerted when this petition effort is launched.

Demand your freedoms and settle for nothing less

We are fighting for nothing less than the freedom of future generations of Americans and world citizens. To stand by and do nothing will result in the complete destruction of the few health freedoms you have remaining. It won't be long before Big Pharma, the FDA and the corporate-sponsored crooks in Washington attempt to ban alternative health information on the internet, and at that point, your ability to access independent, accurate information like the article you're reading right now will be completed stopped.

The USA will become China, but without the Chinese medicine, and if that happens, I fear that the inevitable popular backlash will erupt into a bloody revolution against the oppressors will costs many lives on both sides of the issue. (I will personally have no part in that, since I abhor violence against people, even those who probably deserve it.)

This dangerous turn of events can be avoided now by ending medical oppression and arresting those responsible for this century of medical despair that has haunted western civilization (and led to the suffering and death of countless millions who were harmed by medical quackery). The cancer industry, in particular, has committed crimes against human beings of such magnitude that it legitimately compares to the great Holocaust of World War II. It has suppressed known cancer cures since the 1920's and continues to outlaw natural cancer treatments to this day, resulting in the needless deaths of millions.

"Medical insanity" is redundant

Do not forget that we are dealing with violent, insane criminals in the pharmaceutical industry. They have killed so many millions of people for so long with their dangerous medications that they now consider it routine.

This week, Big Pharma lawyers are arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court that the industry should be granted blanket immunity against ALL claims of harm (or death) resulting from their dangerous medications. If the Supreme Court decides in favor of Big Pharma, it will, in effect, legitimize the mass murder of countless Americans by an industry that will then operate above the law.

These recent developments on statin drugs and the push to medicate healthy people with dangerous drugs is but one sign of the violent radicalization of the medical industry. Armed with their vaccine mandates, their statin drugs in the water supply, their Supreme Court immunity and the armed enforcement of medication by state officers, Big Pharma will have morphed into a dark institution of such immense power and destruction that it could dwarf the mass murder committed by Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot or Mao.

It will be an institution of immense evil that transcends the boundaries of mere medicine and dominates the realms of politics, media and pop culture. (Some say it has already achieved that goal). When young rock stars like the Jonas Brothers are pushing diabetes products, and once-respected authors like Stephen Covey are writing books that push diabetes medications as a form of self improvement, you have to wonder just how deeply the culture has already been infected by Big Pharma's cultist agenda.

Without question, we are up against a beastly, devious juggernaut that will distort science, warp laws and regulations and even kill its own customers in its quest for power and profits. That so few people are aware this is happening is deeply worrisome, for many of the people who might have been able to stand up against the Big Pharma cultist agenda are already drugged beyond recovery. The very minds that could have contributed to the abolishment of this medical holocaust have already fallen victim to it.

Big Pharma's cultist agenda is spreading through the population like a raging infectious disease pandemic, destroying people's minds and racking up the body bags in a pile so large that if it were collected in one place, it would make the deaths of 9/11 look tiny by comparison.

Remember, this is nothing less than a war against human beings, against life itself, and we have all been targeted for medication.

Will medical violence set off an armed backlash by the citizens?

I must ask the obvious ethical question that's bound to crop up in all this: If a gun-toting law enforcement officer marches into your home at the request of a doctor and threatens to kidnap your child, inject her with dangerous chemicals and throw you in prison for resisting, what is the appropriate self defense response?

Virtually every member of the law enforcement community (and I know several) would agree that the appropriate response for dealing with an armed intruder who intends to harm you and your children is to pump them full of lead and call 911 (in that order). That the intruder is dressed in the uniforms of the State may not make any difference to an armed parent acting out of their own self preservation. Sooner or later, someone is likely to pull the trigger out of self defense, and Child Protective Service employees may find themselves in the line of fire from a popular backlash against the medical violence now aimed at our children.

Although I do not condone this behavior, I believe we will soon see this exact scenario argued in the courts. Some parent of a teenage child will invoke their perceived right of self defense by shooting back at those attempting to kidnap them and subject them to violent medical treatments like chemotherapy or radiation therapy. An informed jury could very well decide in favor of the parent. Why? Because they might recognize that every parent has the right to defend themselves and their family members against an imminent threat of violence against their children, even if that threat is veiled in the language of "medicine."

Again, I want to emphasize that in no way do I condone the use of violence to resolve problems, and if I found myself in such a scenario, I would default to the power of the courts (and public opinion) to resolve the situation rather than using destructive instruments like firearms. But I predict someone else will eventually bring this exact scenario to the forefront, and the medical system is going to have to deal with the very real possibility of an armed response to the threat of medical violence against innocent children.

After all, if the medical system doesn't want people to respond with firearms, they shouldn't bring firearms to the scene in the first place. And besides, how bad does a system of medicine have to be that it must enforced at gunpoint anyway? Jeesh.

This nation needs to lay off the tyranny, put down the guns and just let parents live in peace, you know? Medicine is a CHOICE, not a mandate. If a parent wants to say no to vaccines, or chemotherapy, or a heart transplant, that's their natural right. Leave the threat of violence out of it, and let parents make their own informed decisions about health care.

After all, I could argue that vaccines are dangerous for children, and any parent allowing their child to be injected with vaccines is an unfit parent. But it's not within my right to grab a 9mm Glock and run around the neighborhood kidnapping those children at gunpoint and arresting those parents, is it? Yet that's exactly what the medical system is doing today to those parents who side with natural or alternative treatments.

Violence (or the threat of violence) should never be part of any system of medicine, especially in a nation that loudly claims to be a "free country."

Besides, whatever happened to "First, do no harm?"


About the author: Mike Adams is a holistic nutritionist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles. Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes. In 2007, Adams launched EcoLEDs, a manufacturer of mercury-free, energy-efficient LED lighting products that save electricity and help prevent global warming. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support consumer advocacy programs. He's also the founder of a well known HTML email software company whose 'Email Marketing Director' software currently runs the NaturalNews subscription database. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and regularly pursues cycling, nature photography, Capoeira and Pilates. Known by his callsign, the 'Health Ranger,' Adams posts his missions statements, health statistics and health photos at www.HealthRanger.org

NORAD, USNORTHCOM participate in Exercise Vigilant Shield 09

Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. — North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command will participate in Exercise Vigilant Shield 09 Nov. 12 - 18.

The focus of VS09 is on homeland defense and civil support. The exercise will include scenarios to achieve exercise objectives within the maritime, aerospace, ballistic missile defense, cyber, consequence management, strategic communications, and counter terrorism domains.

VS09 will run concurrent with other Department of Defense-sponsored and international exercises to more realistically test the synchronized response of federal, state, local and international mission partners in preparation for homeland defense, homeland security and civil support missions in the United States and abroad.

Concurrent exercises include U.S. Strategic Command GLOBAL LIGHTNING 09 and BULWARK DEFENDER 09; Canada Command DETERMINED DRAGON; California National Guard VIGILANT GUARD; and the State of California GOLDEN GUARDIAN.

VS09 is a Command Post Exercise. During a CPX, many of the forces involved in the exercise are notional and most of the real forces and equipment are not deployed from their home bases.

NORAD is the bi-national command charged with aerospace warning and control, missile warning as well as maritime for the United States and Canada.

Formed in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11, USNORTHCOM is responsible for Homeland Defense and civil support missions.

Bron: http://www.northcom.mil/News/2008/110508.html

Secret Plan For IMF World Dictatorship

Webster Tarpley
Prisonplanet
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008

This is a confidential strategy paper for the November 15 G-20 summit in Washington DC. This is not a new Bretton Woods in any sense, but rather a British-steered attempt to impose the dictatorship of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the entire planet, wiping out all hope of economic recovery, the modernization of the developing countries, and national sovereignty at the same time.

Under this plan, the IMF would dictate the economic policies of all states. The IMF orthodoxy is austerity, sacrifice, deregulation, privatization, union busting, wage reductions, free trade, the race to the bottom, and prohibitions on advanced technologies. These policies would strangle humanity.

The Brazil-Russia-India-China bloc is reportedly objecting to putting so much power into the hands of the IMF, which is dominated by the US and the British, with Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Treasury Secretary Paulson of Goldman Sachs laying down the party line.

The new Chinese economic measures are the opposite of the bankers’ bailouts imposed so far in the wealthier countries. The Chinese will spend $585 billion on infrastructure, transportation, housing, and food production, with special attention to railroads, airports, and roads. The Chinese package is in the spirit of the Franklin D. Roosevelt New Deal, and it will maintain forward progress for China. The US $700 billion bailout and the UK and EU versions are a futile attempt to prop up the $1.5 quadrillion derivatives bubble. Sensible economic policy starts with wiping out the derivatives cancer.

The interest of humanity can only be served by preventing the Washington conference from carrying out the plan outlined below. If Russia, China, and the developing countries can mount an effective opposition, the world will divide into two blocs - a pro-derivatives, anti-production Malthusian-monetarist bloc, which will tend to fall behind because of its own policies; and, on the other hand, an anti-derivatives, pro-production bloc of nations seeking modern technology, and the full fruits of scienitific and economic progress. Persons of good will in all nations are encouraged to mobilize to make sure that their own country joins the pro-production, anti-derivatives bloc.

Preparations the for economic summit in Washington on November 15 are well advanced. Here are the five points which are currently on the agenda to be adopted by the invited heads of state. The overall philosophy is to continue globalization by reinforcing free trade and by creating a world economic government under the IMF.
The IMF Program Reads As Follows:

1) require the credit rating agencies to be registered and monitored and submit to rules of governance;

2) halt the principle of a convergence of accounting standards and re-examine the application of the fair market value rule in the financial field, so as to improve its coherence with the rules of prudence and conservatism;

3) to resolve that no market segment, territory, or financial institution shall escape from a proportionate and adequate regulation, or at the least, surveillance;

4) set up a code of conduct to avoid excessive risk-taking in the financial industry, including in the area of compensation. Supervisors will have to follow this code in evaluating the risk profiles of financial institutions;

5) to entrust to the IMF the primary responsibility, along with the FSF (Financial Stability Forum - Basel), to recommend the necessary measures to restore confidence and stability.

The IMF must be equipped with the essential resources and suitable instruments to support countries in difficulty, and to exert its role of macroeconomic surveillance to the fullest.

Stephen Harper copies Australian Prime Minister John Howard

Europe's secret plan to boost GM crop production

Gordon Brown and other EU leaders in campaign to promote modified foods

By Geoffrey Lean
Sunday, 26 October 2008

AFP/Getty Images

GM corn growing in France, which has since suspended cultivation of modified crops

Gordon Brown and other European leaders are secretly preparing an unprecedented campaign to spread GM crops and foods in Britain and throughout the continent, confidential documents obtained by The Independent on Sunday reveal.

The documents – minutes of a series of private meetings of representatives of 27 governments – disclose plans to "speed up" the introduction of the modified crops and foods and to "deal with" public resistance to them.

And they show that the leaders want "agricultural representatives" and "industry" – presumably including giant biotech firms such as Monsanto – to be more vocal to counteract the "vested interests" of environmentalists.

News of the secret plans is bound to create a storm of protest at a time when popular concern about GM technology is increasing, even in countries that have so far accepted it.

Public opposition has prevented any modified crops from being grown in Britain. France, one of only three countries in Europe to have grown them in any amounts, has suspended their cultivation, and resistance to them is rising rapidly in the other two, Spain and Portugal.

The embattled biotech industry has been conducting a public relations campaign based round the highly contested assertion that genetic modification is needed to feed the world. It has had some success in the Government, where ministers have been increasingly speaking out in favour of the technology, and in the European Commission, with which its lobbyists have boasted of having "excellent working relations".

The secret meetings were convened by Jose Manuel Barroso, the pro-GM President of the Commission, and chaired by his head of cabinet, Joao Vale de Almeida. The prime ministers of each of the EU's 27 member states were asked to nominate a special representative.

Neither the membership of the group, nor its objectives, nor the outcomes of its meetings have been made public. But The IoS has obtained confidential documents, including an attendance list and the conclusions of the two meetings held so far – on 17 July and just two weeks ago on 10 October – written by the chairman.

The list shows that President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany sent close aides. Britain was represented by Sonia Phippard, director for food and farming at the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

The conclusions reveal the discussions were mainly preoccupied with how to speed up the introduction of GM crops and food and how to persuade the public to accept them.

The modified products have to be approved by the EU before they can be sown or sold anywhere in Europe. But though the Commission officials are generally strongly in favour, European governments are split, causing the Council of Ministers, on which they are represented, to be deadlocked.

In that event the bureaucrats on the Commission wave them through anyway. They are legally allowed to do this, but overruled governments and environmental groups are unhappy.

The conclusions of the first meeting called for the "speeding up of the authorisation process based on robust assessments so as to reassure the public", while the second one added: "Decisions could be made faster without compromising safety."

But the documents also make clear that Mr Barroso is going beyond mere exhortation by trying to get prime ministers to overrule their own agriculture and environment ministers in favour of GM. They report that the chairman "recalled the importance for prime ministers to look at the wider picture", "invited the participants to report the discussions of the group to their heads of governments", and "stressed the importance of drawing their attention to ongoing discussions in the Council [of Ministers]".

Helen Holder of Friends of the Earth Europe said: "Barroso's aim is to get GM into Europe as quickly as possible. So he is going straight to prime ministers and presidents to tell them to step on their ministers and get them into line."

The conclusions of the meetings on public opposition are even more incendiary. The documents ponder "how best to deal with public opinion" and call for "an emotion-free, fact-based dialogue on the high standards of the EU GM policy". And they record the chairman emphasising "the role of industry, economic partners and science to actively contribute to such a dialogue". He adds that "the public feels ill-informed" and says "agricultural representatives should be more vocal". And in a veiled swipe at environmental groups he says that the debate "should not be left to certain stakeholders who have a legitimate but vested interest in it".

What they say

'We have to feed an extra 2.5 billion people. It would be extraordinary if we chose not to exploit the most important breakthrough in biological science'

Professor Allan Buckwell

'New developments will benefit the world's poorest farmers: GM rice that is drought-resistant; transgenic crops with genes to protect against disease'

Lord Dick Taverne, Sense About Science

'GM crops pose unacceptable risks to farmers and the environment and have failed to increase yields despite funding at a cost of millions to UK taxpayers'

Kirtana Chandrasekaran, FoE

'GM crops do not increase yields. Scientists have found genetically engineered insecticide in crops can leak and kill beneficial soil fungi'

Peter Melchett, Soil Association

Q & A: The trouble with modified crops

How much GM is grown in Europe?

Very little. The documents boast the area increased by 21 per cent last year, proving "growing interest". But it still only covered 0.119 per cent of Europe's agricultural land.

What are the problems?

Mainly environmental. Official trials in Britain showed that growing GM crops was worse for wildlife than cultivating conventional ones. Worse, genes escape from the modified plants to create superweeds and to contaminate normal and organic crops, denying consumers a choice to be GM-free.

Do they endanger health?

Hard to tell. Some studies show that they may do, others (including almost all those by industry) are reassuring. The trouble is that very few truly independent, peer-reviewed research has been done. Most consumers have sensibly concluded that they would sooner be safe than sorry, particularly as they get no benefit from buying GM.

Can they feed the world?

Almost certainly not. Despite all the hype, present GM varieties actually have lower yields than their conventional counterparts. The seeds are expensive to buy and grow, so wealthy developing-world farmers would tend to use them and drive poor ones out of business, increasing destitution. The biggest agricultural assessment ever conducted – chaired by Professor Robert Watson, now Defra's chief scientist – recently concluded that they would not do the job.

To have your say on this or any other issue visit www.independent.co.uk/IoSblogs

Bron: http://www.independent.co.uk

Webster Tarpley

The men behind Barack Obama part 1

Webster Tarpley

The men behind Barack Obama part 2

MIND DEPROGRAMMING VIDEO JUKEBOX

Rode of de Blauwe pil?

Onderstaande filmpjes zijn met dank aan
The DayJob Orchestra

Democratie; is dat niet "de meeste stemmen gelden"?
Als dat zo is, waarom wordt er dan geen gehoor gegeven aan onze meerderheid van weerstand tegen de oorlogen, de corruptheid en de eindeloze uitbreiding van de Roverheid? Waarom wordt die 'democratie' aan andere landen opgedrongen?

Het is geen democratie, zeker niet in Amerikaanse zin, want dat is een Republiek en geen democratisch land. Nee, we leven in een Totalitaire democratie: eens in de 4 jaar denken we iets te zeggen te hebben, maar in al die tussentijd kunnen de Rambtenaren doen en laten wat ze willen, ongeacht wat het volk dat ze behoren te dienen er van vindt. Minister is latijn voor Dienaar: het enige dat deze maffia dient is hun baas, de bancaire elite!

Bush on Truth Syrum

Cheney in Hell

Condi Rice Freaks out

Eindeloos Liegen...

En 'onze' Roverheid blijft dit tuig geloven?



Er zijn meer van deze filmpjes, stuur ze vooral door aan elkaar!

Holo(pro)gram(ma)

05-11-2008:

Tijdens de Amerikaanse presidentsverkiezingen pakt CNN uit met een wereldprimeur. Met een nieuw hoogtechnologisch snufje beamden ze journaliste Jessica Yellin, die de verkiezingen vanuit Chicago versloeg, door middel van een hologram in de New Yorkse studio. Hiermee treed Yellin in de voetsporen van prinses Leia Organa (Star Wars) :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ2L74fplos

Belastingrecht is geen recht

Dit opmerkelijk gegeven komt naar voren in de column van professor Smalhout in de Telegraaf; in het artikel staat letterlijk:

De belastingheffing is in feite een systematische inbreuk op privacy en particulier eigendom. En dit zogenaamde recht wordt uitgeoefend door topambtenaren die in wezen overheidsmanagers zijn. Zij zijn net als alle andere managers in onze maatschappij. Zij beheren processen, zo efficient en technisch als maar mogelijk is. De inhoud of kwaliteit is minder van belang. De controle is een doel op zichzelf geworden.

Deze technocratische belastingheffing heeft in onze samenleving een vervreemdingsproces op gang gebracht. Hierdoor zijn medemenselijkheid en ethische waarden in de knel gekomen. En dit alles is gebeurd om onze luidkeels geprezen verzorgingsstaat en thans multiculli samenleving te kunnen financieren. Maar die staat veroorzaakt weer vernedering, omdat het mensen afhankelijk maakt van een gigantisch ambtenaren apparaat. Zo is de financiering van die verzorgingsstaat met behulp van het belastingrecht verworden tot een wegwerprecht. Geheel in de stijl van de huidgige wegwerp maatschappij.

Dit heeft geleid tot een wederzijds vijandsbeeld: de berekende belastingontduiker enerzijds en de stroperige, gevoelloze en geldverspillende overheid anderzijds. Bij die laatste staat tegenwoordig niet het woord dienen voorop maar verdienen!

Nederland heeft door dit alles de hoogste belastingdruk ter wereld. Indien wij zowel de directe (bijv. inkomstenbelasting) als de indirecte belastingen (bijv. btw) bij elkaar optellen, betalen wij ongeveer 90% van ons inkomen aan de overheid.

Tot zover prof. Smalhout. In dezelfde krant stond nog een leuk artikeltje: minister Eurlings wil een wetsvoorstel indienen waarbij iemand die probeert de kilometerheffing straks te gaan ontduiken voor 4 jaar de cel in draait. De overheid heeft dus carte blanche om praktisch alles van de burgers te pakken, maar o wee, als iemand dus probeert iets van Den Haag te pakken.

Hoezo recht?

Bron: Schuldhulp.Org

USB-stick Britse overheid verloren

02 November 2008

Voor een Britse pub is een usb-stick met gebruikersnamen en wachtwoorden voor een overheidswebsite gevonden. Via de site kunnen burgers informatie krijgen over onder meer kinderbijslag, belastingteruggave en pensioenrechten.

Volgens een Britse krant kunnen met de usb-stick persoonlijke gegevens worden achterhaald van 12 miljoen mensen die ingelogd zijn geweest op de site. Maar volgens de overheid zijn persoonlijke gegevens niet in gevaar geweest.

Uit voorzorg is de website korte tijd offline gehaald. Vorig jaar verloor de Britse belastingdienst de gegevens van 25 miljoen mensen.

Bron: http://www.nos.nl/nos/artikelen/2008/11/art000001C93CC13D26631C.html

Fleeing Bush Family Detained By US Delta Forces At Camp David

October 31, 2008

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers (Traducción al Español abajo)

Russian FSB reports to Prime Minister Putin today are stating that United States President George Bush and his family were detained by American1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta Troops (SFOD-D) and confined to the US Presidential Retreat located at Camp David as they were preparing to flee to their mountain stronghold in the South American Nation of Paraguay.

Almost entirely ignored by the American people was our October 16, 2006 report “US President Bush Makes Massive Land Purchase In Paraguay Ahead Of Expected War Crimes Charges”, and which the Latin American News Service Prensa Latina further confirmed in their October 16, 2006 report “Bush Buys Land in Northern Paraguay”, and as we can read:

“An Argentine official regarded the intention of the George W. Bush family to settle on the Acuifero Guarani (Paraguay) as surprising, besides being a bad signal for the governments of the region.

Luis D Elia, undersecretary for the Social Habitat in the Argentine Federal Planning Ministry, issued a memo partially reproduced by digital INFOBAE.com, in which he spoke of the purchase by Bush of a 98,842-acre farm in northern Paraguay, between Brazil and Bolivia.”

Equally being ignored by the American people is the reason for the Bush Family needing to flee their country, and as we had, also, previously on in our October 15, 2005 report ‘War Crimes’ Portfolio against United States President, Vice President and Defense Secretary Opened By International Committee of the Red Cross Charging ‘Crimes Against Humanity’, but which they were not allowed to know about until the New York Times reported on this July 11, 2008, and as we can read:

“Red Cross investigators concluded last year in a secret report that the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation methods for high-level Qaeda prisoners constituted torture and could make the Bush administration officials who approved them guilty of war crimes, according to a new book on counterterrorism efforts since 2001.”

To the critical background behind these latest stunning events involving the American President we have, also, reported on in our October 20, 2008 report “Israel To Fall As US Says This Will Be Their ‘Last President’, October 22, 2008 “Top US Generals Flee To EU And Russia In Last Attempt To Stop World War”, October 23, 2008 “Obama Summoned To US Military Stronghold In Hawaii By Top Generals”, October 25, 2008 “Iranian Leader In Secret Meet With Obama At US Military Stronghold In Hawaii”, and our October 27, 2008 report “Obama-Ahmadinejad Meet Spurs Attacks On Syria, CIA”.

To the current events involving the detaining of the American President by his own Military Forces, these reports continue, the Top US Generals seeking to prevent Bush from plunging the World into Total War prior to his ouster from office were ‘shocked’ by the CIA and Bush Families private Blackwater Forces (accurately described as Bush’s Shadow Army) attack upon Syria, and which the Bush coup plotters had hoped would invoke the Syrian-Iranian mutual defense pact signed in May, 2008 causing Iran to swiftly retaliate.

[Note: The Bush family connection with the destructive course of the United States predates World War II with their support of Adolph Hitler and his German Nazi Fascists Forces, continued on with their failed coup against President Roosevelt in 1933, which then led up to their murder of President John F. Kennedy who attempted to destroy their private Federal Reserve Bank controlling the wealth of America, further continued with the destruction of President Nixon allowing one of the cover-up conspirators of the Warren Commission investigation President Kennedy’s assassination to become President, Gerald Ford, who then appointed George Bush as director of the CIA, who then blackmailed President Reagan to become his Vice President who George Bush then attempted to assassinate using the CIA ‘drug’ controlled use of one of his close family friends named John Hinckley, to ultimately lead to the catastrophic day of September 11, 2001 which saw the total destruction of the World Trade Center which, conveniently, had been closed for the first time in its history the weekend before its destruction by Bush son Neil to ‘install security equipment’, and all of which have led to their ultimate goal of establishing their family as dictators for life over the entire United States.]

Iran, however, and as these reports state, did not invoke their mutual defense pact with Syria as they had previously been assured by the anti-coup US Generals that should the Bush Family be expelled from power American diplomatic recognition of their Nation would be immediate, and as we had previously reported on and which the Seattle Times News Service still remains the only US media outlet who still refuses to blackout this information from the American public, and as we can read:

“The Bush administration will announce in mid-November, after the presidential election, that it intends to establish the first U.S. diplomatic presence in Iran since the 1979-81 hostage crisis, according to senior Bush administration officials.”

FSB reports state that the ‘senior Bush administration officials’ who authorized the release of this stunning information were directed to do so by their own Defense Secretary Robert Gates who had once headed the CIA, but who before being forced from office, but not before discovering the monstrous coup being planned for the United States by the Bush Family, had laid ‘careful’ plans to retake America from the fascist forces devoted to its destruction.

Reports coming from the United States confirm that President Bush is, indeed, being ‘moved’ to Camp David and are further reporting the appalling news that $163 billion of their taxpayers money is being used to ‘pay off’ Bush loyalists by paying dividends to the shareholders of bankrupt US banks, and when combined with today’s reporting that the US oil giant Exxon-Mobile has, once again, set a new American record for profits, the rape of the American people by the Bush Family coup forces is nearly complete.

It goes without saying that the information we’ve contained in this report will, once again, be ignored by the vast majority of the American people as it is labeled by them too appalling to ever be true. What fails them, however, is the historical fact that the most appalling and unimaginable news that has ever been reported has also been the most accurate.

One example that comes to mind is the Sorcha Faal’s July 28, 1939 report “US-Britain-French-Soviet Pact Spells Annihilation For European Jews”, and which, sadly, accurately detailed what was to come as on September 17, 1939 German Nazi and Russian Soviet Forces invaded Poland beginning World War II.

But, and which no American is able to explain even to this day, only Germany had war declared upon it by the Western Nations of England and France.

So here we are, once again, living in a World so monstrous that the lies of the propagandists are believed while the small voices of those like us are held up to ridicule and disdain.

But, as we have accepted our mission we must also accept our fate, no matter the ridicule, no matter the hate, no matter what befalls us…after all, and as our faith has always shown, truth carries its own defense and it has always been on our side.

And in closing this report, we would be remiss in not reminding our American Sisters of our previous reports “Prophet Of Barack Obama Warns Of Catastrophic US Destruction”, “Vatican Moves For Total US Takeover With Obama Vice President Pick” and “Bush Converts To Catholicism As Cheney Power Grab Leaves Top US Newsman Dead”, all of which have been brought into sharp relief by the murder yesterday of Rome’s Top Jesuit Leader in Moscow Otto Messmer.

© October 31, 2008 EU and US all rights reserved.

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]

Bron: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1159.htm

We Are The Ones We Have Been Waiting For